Speciation 98: Abstracts
David A. Brown, L. Cuffe, N. J. Fitzpatrick, W. K. Glass and K. Herlihy
Department of Chemistry, University College, Dublin, Ireland
The energies of different conformations of primary and secondary hydroxamic acids: -RCONR'OH; R = CH3, C2H5; R1 = CH3 were calculated at the MP2 level using a 6 - 311++G* basis set which places both diffuse and polarization functions on atoms. The results show that for both aceto and N-methyl acetohydroxamic acids the most stable forms are the E anticlinal followed by the Z synperiplanar. Similar calculations were carried out on corresponding hydrates which resulted in preferential stabilization of the Z conformer. Finally, calculations were carried out using a spherical cavity approximation to simulate solvent effects thereby comparing dichloromethane and water as solvents. The E isomer was preferentially stabilized in CH2Cl2 whilst the Z isomer was the more stable conformer in water. Rotational barriers were calculated and compared with experimental (NMR) values.
Metal complexation utilizing the normal O,O mode of hydroxamate-metal coordination requires initial formation of the Z conformer and overcoming any E-rotational barrier. The effects of this barrier are also reflected in kinetic parameters obtained from the sequestration of iron by hydroxamic acids from the polynuclear iron complex, [Fe11O6(OH)6(O2CPh)15]. It is hoped to extend these studies to -aminohydroxamic acids e.g. glycine hydroxamic acid which is capable of acting as both an O,O coordinator and an N,N coordinator to different metals.
Aceto | gas | ||
hydroxamic | CH2Cl2 | ||
acid | H2O | ||
Propano | gas | ||
hydroxamic | CH2Cl2 | ||
acid | H2O | ||
N-methyl aceto | gas | ||
hydroxamic | CH2Cl2 | ||
acid | H2O |